<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote of the Week</title>
	<link>http://civictourism.org/blog/index.php/2006/06/28/quote-of-the-week-4/</link>
	<description>A blog regarding Civic Tourism</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dan Shilling</title>
		<link>http://civictourism.org/blog/index.php/2006/06/28/quote-of-the-week-4/#comment-22</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 06:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://civictourism.org/blog/index.php/2006/06/28/quote-of-the-week-4/#comment-22</guid>
					<description>Absolutely. We include culture in the social bottom line - the relationships between people and the ways they manifest themsevles: art, religion, economics, architecture, politics, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. We include culture in the social bottom line &#8211; the relationships between people and the ways they manifest themsevles: art, religion, economics, architecture, politics, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lyn LE</title>
		<link>http://civictourism.org/blog/index.php/2006/06/28/quote-of-the-week-4/#comment-21</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 02:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://civictourism.org/blog/index.php/2006/06/28/quote-of-the-week-4/#comment-21</guid>
					<description>The triple bottom line leaves out one important element of sustainability - the cultural. Tourism has enormous impacts on cultural practice, which vary in intensity and consequence with the nature of the host community.

Interpreting cultural heritage (both tangible and intangible, historic and contemporary) requires cultural understanding and sensitivity. So does place (destination) marketing, as it creates expectations about the nature of 'experiences' that visitors to a place will find. 

Planning, development, marketing, management, interpretation - all require integration of the four elements of sustainability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The triple bottom line leaves out one important element of sustainability &#8211; the cultural. Tourism has enormous impacts on cultural practice, which vary in intensity and consequence with the nature of the host community.</p>
<p>Interpreting cultural heritage (both tangible and intangible, historic and contemporary) requires cultural understanding and sensitivity. So does place (destination) marketing, as it creates expectations about the nature of &#8216;experiences&#8217; that visitors to a place will find.</p>
<p>Planning, development, marketing, management, interpretation &#8211; all require integration of the four elements of sustainability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan Shilling</title>
		<link>http://civictourism.org/blog/index.php/2006/06/28/quote-of-the-week-4/#comment-19</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 17:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://civictourism.org/blog/index.php/2006/06/28/quote-of-the-week-4/#comment-19</guid>
					<description>Ha, I fear the &quot;hat trick&quot; metaphor would be lost on our many non-cricket or non-hockey communities. That said, the challenge is to see the accountants as just ONE component of the triple bottom line, not the decisive voice. When we give our presentations, the economists sometimes complain that we're de-emphasizing the financial aspects of tourism. On the contrary, we're just trying to put things in balance. In that sense, Civic Tourism mirrors the tripartite model for democracy - government, business, civil society. When the three-legged stool gets out of balance (as it is today, with an over-emphasis on business and government), we lose. Regarding the quote from the book above, you are right: they still put too much stress on winning financially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, I fear the &#8220;hat trick&#8221; metaphor would be lost on our many non-cricket or non-hockey communities. That said, the challenge is to see the accountants as just <span class="caps">ONE</span> component of the triple bottom line, not the decisive voice. When we give our presentations, the economists sometimes complain that we&#8217;re de-emphasizing the financial aspects of tourism. On the contrary, we&#8217;re just trying to put things in balance. In that sense, Civic Tourism mirrors the tripartite model for democracy &#8211; government, business, civil society. When the three-legged stool gets out of balance (as it is today, with an over-emphasis on business and government), we lose. Regarding the quote from the book above, you are right: they still put too much stress on winning financially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: planeta</title>
		<link>http://civictourism.org/blog/index.php/2006/06/28/quote-of-the-week-4/#comment-18</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 17:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://civictourism.org/blog/index.php/2006/06/28/quote-of-the-week-4/#comment-18</guid>
					<description>Great quote and great thoughts.

That said, 'triple bottom line' is all well and good, but it makes civic tourism a tool of the accountants, rather than that of entrepreneurs and innovators. Why not call it a hat trick?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great quote and great thoughts.</p>
<p>That said, &#8216;triple bottom line&#8217; is all well and good, but it makes civic tourism a tool of the accountants, rather than that of entrepreneurs and innovators. Why not call it a hat trick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
